[Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669


redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
           Keywords|Reopened                    |
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-12 16:19 EST -------
I'm very very sorry. Rawhide build of filesystem is what I expected, but my 
local (mock) build of filesystem is the opposite - just everything I claimed
in comment #27. No matter what went wrong, but this is another thing.

Bill and Rex, thank you very much for doing the job and adding the directories 
to filesystem package :)

Finally I'm pointing to rpm >= 4.4.6, which helped me to figger out this issue. 
For me this bug report was just another (daily) example why Fedora Core should 
be definitely upgraded to a current rpm release. But looks like Jesse and Seth 
etc. are not interested in such enhancements, otherwise they and others would 
have tested it and they wouldn't argue against such really useful things...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]