Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560172 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev@xxxxxxx> 2010-02-08 21:13:43 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > > The following line doesn't work as intended: > find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; > > You can replace it w/ this: > find \( -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' \) -exec rm -rf {} \; > fixed according to the Specfile Template for ant https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#ant_2 > > As far as the changelog you have a typo, "Jun 2010" should be "Jan 2010". > fixed > Also why did you remove the previous entries from the changelog > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/jvyamlb/F-11/jvyamlb.spec?view=markup > No, changelog in the release 0.2.5-3 contains full history. > Also I didn't try, but if it works w/ gcj (java-devel >= 1.5) adding gcj > support to the spec is relatively easy: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines Releases of the package was never containing gcj bits. We shouldn't add stuff of the deprecated technology into this package. Clarification is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560170#c5 The release 4 is prepared for review: Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/jvyamlb.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/jvyamlb-0.2.5-4.fc13.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review