Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-12 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > and both itpp-config and /usr/lib/pkgconfig/itpp.pc appear to work correctly > for me. Yes, it should work correctly. I just wonder whether "-lfftw3 -llapack -latlas -lblas -L/usr/lib/atlas -lstdc++ -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s" is REALLY needed for the two file (itpp-config & itpp.pc) . "-lfftw3....." is really needed when compiling libitpp.so (i.e., in building this package). However, once linking is corectly done (as in -7 src.rpm) and since no header files include header files in other packages, including "-lfftw3".... to itpp-config & itpp.pc is perhaps redundant. In short, I think that itpp.pc can be: ---------------------------------------------------------- prefix=/usr exec_prefix=/usr libdir=/usr/lib includedir=/usr/include Name: IT++ Description: IT++ is a C++ library of mathematical, signal processing, speech processing, and communications classes and fu nctions Version: 3.10.5 URL: http://itpp.sourceforge.net/ Libs: -L${libdir} -litpp Cflags: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- and itpp-config can be: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ............................... --libs) echo -L${libdir} -litpp ;; --libs-opt) echo -L${libdir} -litpp ;; --libs-debug) echo -L${libdir} -litpp ;; ........................................................ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please check if this is possible. Other things are okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review