[Bug 562504] Review Request: mpi4py - Python bindings of the Message Passing Interface (MPI)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562504

--- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-07 18:28:22 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The subpackages need to Requires: mpi4py-common, since the license etc is in
> -common.
> 
> Move the large documentation stuff into -doc.

Done

> The names of the python3 versions are IMHO a bit odd, but this seems to be the
> way python3 is packaged in Fedora.

Also don't know a better way. packages like mpi4py-openmpi-python3 are not
better.


- Testsuite is enabled, and fails within 2 tests for openmpi. For mpich2 both
tests pass. (Both for python2 and python3)
  The failing is reported upstream at:
  http://code.google.com/p/mpi4py/issues/detail?id=14

New koji build is failing, because mpd can not be started:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1967879

Don't know how to to that part better. Here locally it works.
Maybe it's not possible to do that in the buildsystem.
Do you have an idea? Did you have a similar case?


Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/mpi4py.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/mpi4py-1.2-4.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]