Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #15 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2010-02-07 06:24:35 EST --- Hi Mattias, 1) Can you submit a bug for # rpmlint dpm dpm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libdpm.so.1.7.4 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. 2) Request only: Given there are two different versions of rf* commands out there any chance these ones could become of managed by alternatives key of rfio so as to exist with. > rpm -ql castor-rfio-client /usr/bin/rfcat /usr/bin/rfchmod /usr/bin/rfcp /usr/bin/rfdir /usr/bin/rfmkdir /usr/bin/rfrename /usr/bin/rfrm /usr/bin/rfstat and man pages. Obviously castor-rfio does not exist in Fedora but it might one day. It certainly does here of course. 3) I realise this is an upstream thing but both lfc and dpm-nameserver use a database called cns_db by default. If possible/easy could one be changed. 4) Finally same comments for dpm and lfc about the use of a -common package for each with configuration files to avoid things like. # rpm -qf /etc/DPMCONFIG file /etc/DPMCONFIG is not owned by any package Other than these I've run out of things to look for at the moment. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review