Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557969 --- Comment #3 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-04 21:41:12 EST --- I manually verified that at least some of the files reported by licensecheck did not contain copyright/license information, and I manually verified that some of the files not reported do contain copyright/license information. Actually, there are more of them with missing information than I listed above, because I forgot the -r option to licensecheck: ../interoperability/__init__.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./interoperability/xls/__init__.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./interoperability/xls/compound.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./interoperability/xls/workbook.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./interoperability/xls/function.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./interoperability/xls/convert_to_scalcstring.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./interoperability/lotus_wk4.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN (The first two above just contain "pass", so a copyright or license on those would be meaningless.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review