Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From notting@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-11 11:56 EST ------- Got a response: > Upon reviewing our package in Fedora Extras, someone noticed > the following license clause: > > "The artwork and sounds used by Maelstrom are copyright Ambrosia Software > (http://www.ambrosiasw.com) and may not be redistributed separately from > the Maelstrom public GPL release." > > See the thread at: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-May/msg00365.html > > especially: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-May/msg00417.html > > Basically, the question is, could this be considered as the > GPL release being the *entirety* of the tarball, covering > the artwork & sounds (and therefore a contradictory license)? > > Could this be clarified? (Possibly just switch 'public GPL release' with > 'GPL source code'? Sure. "GPL source code" is correct. :) I'll update the release, thanks! See ya! -Sam Lantinga, Senior Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review