Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-04 08:57:27 EST --- Cou(In reply to comment #2) > What should I do with _network.c and _cpd.c, which give me rpmlint errors: > python-pebl.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_network.c > python-pebl.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_cpd.c If they are required at runtime, leave them in the main package. If they don't, I'd propably delete them. > Neither of IPython1 and PyXg are included in Fedora, however, they are not > necessary for running the program. Should I make a README.package file > describing the situation or should I mention this in the summary of the > package. What do you think? If the programm does not crash, if they are not installed, I'd mention in the spec file as a comment for you, that this are optional packages. > Lastly, rpmlint gives me the following error: > python-pebl.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib > What does that mean? You can run "rpmlint -I explicit-lib-dependency". "You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags." So R: python-matplotlib is not needed, but this could be a rpmlint bug, because I don't see it adding the Requires itself: Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: /usr/bin/python libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review