[Bug 551265] Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551265

Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-02 17:32:16 EST ---
Package revienw : 

 [OK]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
 [OK]  Specfile name matches %{name}.spec
 [OK]  Package seems to meet Packaging Guidelines
 [OK]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least
one
       supported architecture : Builds on koji
 [OK]  Rpmlint output: the warning about "noreplace" config file can be ignored
 [OK]  Package is not relocatable.
 [OK]  License in specfile matches actual License and meets Licensing
Guidelines
 [OK]  License file is included in %doc.
 [OK]  Specfile is legible and written in AE
 [OK]  Sourcefile in the Package is the same as provided in the mentioned
Source
 [OK]  Package compiles successfully
 [OK]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
 [N/A] Specfile handles locales properly
 [N/A] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
 [N/A] Package owns directorys it creates
 [OK]  Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [OK] Package does not list a file more than once in the %files listing
 [OK] %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly
 [OK] %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
 [OK] Macros are consistently used
 [OK] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [N/A] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage
 [OK] Program runs properly without files listed in %doc
 [N/A] Header files are in a -devel package
 [N/A] Static libraries are in a -static package
 [N/A] Package requires pkgconfig if .pc files are present
 [N/A] .so-files are put into a -devel subpackage
 [N/A] Subpackages include fully versioned dependency for the base package
 [N/A] Any libtool archives (*.la) are removed
 [N/A] contains desktop file (%{name}.desktop) if it is a GUI application
 [OK] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 [OK] %{buildroot} is removed at beginning of %install
 [N/A] Filenames are encoded in UTF-8

Also GConf rules are respected :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf

This package is APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]