Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856 --- Comment #9 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-30 05:30:03 EST --- > It fails to do with nlist.h I already moved nlist.h into /usr/include/bsd. I don't know why we're still arguing about that one. > At the very point a devel package is installed it > "is around", i.e. is can be used for arbitrary purposes, By a conscious choice of a developer, certainly. That is, in fact, the purpose of -devel subpackages. > Me asking you to install its headers into a subdirectory is an > attempt to isolate this package (e.g. from accidental use) and to prevent it to > cause potential damage. You've failed to explain how the headers /usr/include/vis.h and /usr/include/libutil.h can be "accidentally used". When I write software, I don't throw in #includes of random headers I don't deliberately intend to use. The fact that no Fedora package provides or uses /usr/include/vis.h or /usr/include/libutil.h seems sufficient to ensure that no one is going to use libbsd without intending to do so. > I feel this package is not ready for public consumption. If I had some idea of how the "public" might accidentally "consume" these two headers, I'd be a lot less reluctant to move them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review