Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549604 David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david@xxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> 2010-01-30 00:43:26 EST --- php pulls in a lot of dependencies, try php-common instead. Package name doesn't conform to guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP#Naming_scheme Based on my quick checking license field in spec is questionable because they mention LGPL (which would be LGPLv2+) and yet has a LGPLv3 logo. No license in source, so website is the 'canonical reference' for what license they use. It'd be nice for you to contact upstream and ask them for: 1. clarification on which license. 2. To identify specifically which license in source 3. To include a license file. If they only do 1, include text of email exchange as a doc, and won't issue another release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review