Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-10 12:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #26) > > Ralf, thanks for the opinion, but many (including me and the reviewer) disagree. > > OK, Rex, elaborate which problems this issue causes in this particular case and > what it breaks. > The main problem for undefined non-weak symbols is that this may produce symbols conflict. As you can see by "rpm -q --requires itpp-3.10.5-5.fc6", this package (without this problem fixed) does NOT require libstdc++.so.6 (because libitpp.so.2.2.0 is not linked against it) although it surely require it. So this package can be installed which uses libstdc++.so.5, for example, which surely cause symbol conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review