Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529198 --- Comment #9 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-28 18:32:08 EST --- My theory is, if it's a MUST in the guidelines, then it's required... even if it's automated. I checked; all of the comments above have now been addressed. Thanks!! I did a few checks to make sure the new version didn't add surprises. I rebuilt the new version. It whines with a lot of warnings, but it builds fine. rpmlint output for this version is the same as before (see comment 5), so that's fine: rpmlint pynac.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/pynac-* ../SRPMS/pynac-0.1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm pynac-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I also did a mock build to see if new dependencies were created: mock --rebuild ../SRPMS/pynac-0.1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm and it went fine. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review