Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558061 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2010-01-28 16:32:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) > I'm reluctant to replace lapack with Atlas due to my lack of experience with > the latter. I'd rather stick with lapack for now, and consider switching to > Atlas at some later date. (I'll be more enthusiastic about switching if anyone > using the Fedora levmar package requests the switch, and even more so if they > try it and report that it works well and is noticably faster for their > application.) ATLAS is just another implementation of the same routines (and it actually uses LAPACK itself for many things). For instance in Octave we have just changed to ATLAS, which results in speedups of an order of magnitude or so. So there really is a huge difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review