Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #20 from W. Michael Petullo <mike@xxxxxxxx> 2010-01-27 20:12:30 EST --- The rpmlint message is clearly a false positive. I'm not claiming that my code is perfect, but I do think it is bad practice to modify it because rpmlint made an unjustified complaint. To be honest, the right answer would probably be to replace the use of "dmapd" with $prog in all but the prog= declaration. I would like some more official feedback regarding the /var/db/dmapd issue. As I stated, I am going for ease of install. There is a precedent for this technique (httpd's /var/www comes to mind). Also, the choice of /var is consistent with the FHS. There is precedent for db, but I am not wed to it (i.e., one could argue /var/lib is better, but the FHS is a bit vague on the intent behind this directory). I'd like to find a clear Fedora policy on 1) creating a data directory so that a pre-configured server may be installed 2) /var/db vs. /var/lib, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review