Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559117 --- Comment #7 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-27 15:06:28 EST --- OK. Regarding the icon, I'll move it into /usr/share/pixmaps as recommended, but I thought I'd point out why I put it in /usr/share/icons/hicolor in the first place. From the freedesktop.org Icon Theme Specification: http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-0.11.html "So, you're an application author, and want to install application icons so that they work in the KDE and Gnome menus. Minimally you should install a 48x48 icon in the hicolor theme. This means installing a PNG file in $prefix/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps." I can't see any way to interpret this that allows for the hicolor theme to be optional; it seems that if Fedora intends to be compliant with freedesktop.org standards, the hicolor theme *must* be provided. Anyhow, I'm not pushing for any change in Fedora policy, but since Fedora icon policy differs from the freedesktop.org standard, it might be desirable to update the desktop section of the packaging policy to explicitly state that the basic fedora icon requirement is to use /usr/share/pixmaps. That might prevent another novice packager from making the same mistake I did. Here's the updated lcdtest package: Spec URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/f12/lcdtest/lcdtest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/f12/lcdtest/lcdtest-1.18-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build for f12-dist: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1948905 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review