Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 --- Comment #7 from Adrian Reber <adrian@xxxxxxxx> 2010-01-27 08:21:16 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > > MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] > > %files devel > [...] > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libmpdclient.pc > > But requirement on pkgconfig. This is no longer true. rpm detects pkgconfig files and adds the correct requirements. $ rpm -qp libmpdclient-devel-2.1-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm -R /usr/bin/pkg-config libmpdclient = 2.1 libmpdclient.so.2()(64bit) > FAIL > > > MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] > > OK > > > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] > > %package devel > [...] > Requires: %{name} = %{version} > > FAIL This is in the spec file since the beginning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review