[Bug 556161] Review Request: sslscan - Security assesment tool for ssl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556161

--- Comment #4 from timlank <timlank@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-25 12:31:51 EST ---
Thats interesting and I don't know how to explain.

I basically took the .spec file and the .src.rpm as listed in the review
request, downloaded them to my minimal system, installed the source RPM and
then performed the rpmbuild -ba on the source -- which tries to rebuild the
source RPM and build the binary rpm. 

So the patch that was used was the one that was in the .src.rpm that is listed
in the first entry in this review request.

my particular system is using these versions of the patch and diff utilites...

# rpm -qf /usr/bin/patch /usr/bin/diff
patch-2.5.4-40.fc12.x86_64
diffutils-2.8.1-25.fc12.x86_64

Thanks,
Tim

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]