Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556161 --- Comment #4 from timlank <timlank@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-25 12:31:51 EST --- Thats interesting and I don't know how to explain. I basically took the .spec file and the .src.rpm as listed in the review request, downloaded them to my minimal system, installed the source RPM and then performed the rpmbuild -ba on the source -- which tries to rebuild the source RPM and build the binary rpm. So the patch that was used was the one that was in the .src.rpm that is listed in the first entry in this review request. my particular system is using these versions of the patch and diff utilites... # rpm -qf /usr/bin/patch /usr/bin/diff patch-2.5.4-40.fc12.x86_64 diffutils-2.8.1-25.fc12.x86_64 Thanks, Tim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review