Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #8 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-25 11:07:04 EST --- According to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines Section "License Clarification": "In cases where the licensing is unclear, it may be necessary to contact the copyright holders to confirm the licensing of code or content. In those situations, it is _always_ preferred to ask upstream to resolve the licensing confusion by documenting the licensing and releasing an updated tarball. However, this is not always possible to achieve. In such cases, it is acceptable to receive confirmation of licensing via email. A copy of the email, containing full headers, must be included as a source file (marked as %doc) in the package. This file is considered part of the license text. " Although you've included a "license.txt" file, the package doesn't include the actual email as required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review