Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551912 Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-24 13:06:43 EST --- I've roughly scanned over the package and I've seen a couple of issues. It would be good if they could be fixed first before I do the full complete review: - source files differ from upstream and the source URL does not match the link on the download page: http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/sources/monodevelop-java/monodevelop-java-2.2.tar.bz2 - License: it looks like that the source files and the COPYING file points to GPLv2+ instead of MIT - please can you check this? - package does not build (x86_64): Looking for required packages Checking for package 'mono-addins'.. found. Checking for package 'gtk-sharp-2.0'.. ERROR: Package named 'gtk-sharp-2.0' >= 2.12.8 not found. Try adjusting your PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.d20ndr (%build) RPM build errors: - directory %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/JavaBinding must be packaged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review