Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-09 13:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Oops.. This breaks start up symbol, however, linkage aganst libstdc++.so.6 > > is broken, anyway. > Nope, you're simply trying to overengineer a non-issue. Well, I don't this is a non-issue. At least, this is unwilling problem. And this undefined non-weak symbols problem disappeard by linking against libstdc++.so.6 ( I confirmed ) , so the fix should be done as such. [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libitpp.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x004ba000) libfftw3.so.3 => /usr/lib/libfftw3.so.3 (0x00eb7000) liblapack.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/liblapack.so.3 (0x0064a000) libatlas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libatlas.so.3 (0x00f49000) libblas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libblas.so.3 (0x07673000) libgfortran.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgfortran.so.1 (0x003da000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00b1c000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00459000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x004bb000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00b98000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00465000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00b7d000) ( after fix, no undefined non-weak symbol appears any more ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review