Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557169 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-22 06:10:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks, I made the configure, rpath and make changes. > > I'm really not sure *what* to do with the libs, they're a run-time dependancy > of the binaries and I'm not sure that anyone else will us them. Does it make > sense to have foo and foo-devel when they foo requires foo-devel? If nothing requires the libs, it would be ok for me, to package them into the main package (the versioned *.so.?.?.?). The other *.so and *.so.? should indeed go into a -devel package. Why do you package static libs? (Better delete them completely.) > Odd, how did you get it to crash? The only trouble I have is if something else > is creating a sound at that time and it can't open the sound device. Otherwise > I can startBristol -mini, for example, and play my little heart out. :) "Try 'startBristol -b3' or 'startBristol -jack', for example, if you are unsure." So I started 'startBristol -jack' and it crashes on startup, or on clicking... 'startBristol -mini' works... > > I'm torn on the .desktop file issue. It'd be great to have one, maybe for > -mini, but do startBristol -h and have a look at how many there are. I'm not > doing 20+ .desktop files. I think, you should pick one as exapmle and start this with the desktop file. e.g. -b3 (the upstream default one) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review