Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-21 03:38:51 EST --- To clarify again, I think "GPL+" is correct for now. GPL plus BSD = GPL: the library is not dual-licensed so GPL+ is the correct license AFAICT. (In reply to comment #7) > You're right SHA256.hsc is marked GPL. I actually talked > to the author about this and he remarked that he had rewritten > the file recently but that does not affect this review... (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review