Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 ------- Additional Comments From amlai@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-09 04:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Ok, so please add that response to a file you add in Source (with > a mention of the date, too). The licence is now clearly X11, there > is no code under the BSD licence in xcalc. I was unsure of how exactly to proceed with this. What I did was to add a source with full url to the X11R7.0 license. I also added a file LICENSE.xcalc documenting the licensing issue and John Bradley's corresponding response. (In reply to comment #21) > * you miss a make invocation in %build Wow... not sure how I missed that one all this time. > * in the changelog for 1.0.1-4, I think the file wasn't an 'xpm file', > but an 'xbm file'. And there is dekstop instead of desktop Fixed. LICENSE.xcalc: http://www.columbia.edu/~amlai/xcalc/LICENSE.xcalc Spec URL: http://www.columbia.edu/~amlai/xcalc/xcalc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.columbia.edu/~amlai/xcalc/xcalc-1.0.1-6.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review