Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-xcalc - X.org XCalc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513 ------- Additional Comments From amlai@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-08 23:10 EST ------- I received a reply from John Bradley. I think we are in the clear. I have copied his reply verbatim below: xcalc, eh? Good lord, I haven't seen or thought about *that* in 15 years or so. Personally, I disavowed all interest in that project when some MIT people rewrote the thing for X11, using Xt. (My original was for X10R3/R4, and used Xlib only.) I've never used Xt, actively disliked it at the time, and have never bothered to look at or otherwise understand the X11 version of the xcalc source. Anyway... I don't care *at all* about xcalc, or any parts thereof that still have my name on them. Anyone's free to do whatever they'd like with it, as far as I'm concerned. X11R7 license? Sure, why not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review