Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource@xxxxxxxxx Resolution|RAWHIDE | Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- --- Comment #11 from Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-17 13:46:55 EST --- I object that the review is completed, the -static problem was not solved. In comment:6 it was staid that libiberty.a should be removed and probably the other .a files, too, as far as I understand the comment. But they are still shipped and there is also not -static package, so something is obviously wrong. Btw. is there a FESCo exception to allow bundling libiberty? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review