Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #12 from Klaus Grue <grue@xxxxxxx> 2010-01-17 08:53:49 EST --- > So it means that compiling logiweb needs bootstrapping? Yes. Here is the procedure for bootstrapping: mkdir ~/foo cd ~/foo Download logiweb-0.1.10.tar.gz tar zxf logiweb-0.1.10.tar.gz cd logiweb-0.1.10/ make build The 'make build' target first compiles the lgc compiler using CLISP and then makes the lgc compiler compile itself. Furthermore, 'make build' generates a complete Version 0.2.6 with changelogs and everything. The result of 'make build' is in ~/foo/logiweb-0.1.10/lgc/build/self. 'make build' takes 15 minutes on my 3GHz machine. Ignore the diff: ../lgc: No such file or directory error message at the end of 'make build'. Running 'make build' includes running a testsuite. Running that testsuite could be omitted, reducing the run time to about 10 minutes. Here is the procedure for verifying that Version 0.2.6 is what it claims to be: cd ~/foo Download logiweb-0.2.6.tar.gz tar zxf logiweb-0.2.6.tar.gz diff -r logiweb-0.1.10/lgc/build/self/ logiweb-0.2.6/ The output from diff shall be empty. > If so, please do bootstrap during rpmbuild. Does that mean that you prefer rpmbuild to run 'make build' of logiweb-0.1.10 instead of the present solution which uses a pre-built pages.c ? I made Logiweb-0.2.x to become independent of CLISP so that it became easier to port Logiweb to other platforms. And it was my hope that the procedure above for verifying that Version 0.2.6 is what it claims to be would allow to include the pre-built pages.c in the source RPM rather than including the whole collection of CLISP sources. But it is of course not up to me to decide what Fedora prefers. If you want, I can make a new version in which CLISP is included in the build requirements and in which the source RPM contains no pre-built binaries like pages.c. > When you enable bootstrap in the spec file, I can ask spot > if your method is acceptable on Fedora. Thanks. Just to be sure, is it correct that spot=Tom 'spot' Callaway or is spot some Fedora committee? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review