[Bug 553205] Merge Review: perl-Error - Error/exception handling in an OO-ish way

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553205

Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |iarnell@xxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |iarnell@xxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-17 03:41:09 EST ---
+ source files match upstream.  
  203bc410ae5040e7b647a52aa0fabafe  Error-0.17015.tar.gz

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
  GPL+ or Artistic

+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text not included upstream.
- latest version is being packaged.
  0.17016 is available

+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=145298

+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no complaints:
  perl-Error.noarch: I: checking
  perl-Error.src: I: checking
  2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ final provides and requires are sane:
  perl(Error) = 0.17015
  perl(Error::Simple)
  perl(Error::WarnDie)
  perl(Error::subs)
  perl-Error = 1:0.17015-4.fc13
=
  perl >= 0:5.004
  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
  perl(Error)
  perl(Exporter)
  perl(Scalar::Util)
  perl(overload)
  perl(strict)
  perl(vars)
  perl(warnings)
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
  rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1

+ %check is present and all tests pass.
  All tests successful.
  Files=15, Tests=64,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr  0.02 sys +  0.49 cusr  0.19
csys =  0.75 CPU)
  Result: PASS

+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


APPROVED - only minor problem is that this isn't the latest upstream version -
0.17016 is available.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]