Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-08 13:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Hi Mamoru, thanks for the feedback. I'll fix the license inclusion, the > redundant BRs and the time-stamp issue and will post another SRPM. > > So how did you get rpmlint to produce all the undefined-non-weak-symbol > warnings? Try: "rpmlint itpp (with itpp installed)". This rpmlint can be gained only when used for installed rpms. See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00825.html Well, for now these warning can be ignored because I tried to link against libitpp.so and it succeeded so this is NOT a blocker. [tasaka1@localhost PROGRAM]$ cat itpp-check.cpp int main(){ return 0; } [tasaka1@localhost PROGRAM]$ g++ -Wall -O2 -o itpp-check itpp-check.cpp `itpp-config --libs` -L/usr/lib/atlas However, I recommend that you report this to upstream. Anyway, fix the dependency for -devel package. > When I run rpmlint against all of the rpms generated here on > my system, I only get these two lines: > > W: itpp-devel no-documentation > E: itpp-debuginfo script-without-shebang > /usr/src/debug/itpp-3.10.5/itpp/base/itpp_version.h > > which, in my opinion, are both safe to ignore. The first one (no-documentation issue) can be ignored, I think too. The latter one is because: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1542 Jul 12 18:33 /usr/src/debug/itpp-3.10.5/itpp/base/itpp_version.h The permission should be 0644, not 0755. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review