[Bug 207782] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-08 12:30 EST -------
Well, from my viewpoint:

1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :

* rpmlint
  - rpmlint is not silent.

E: itpp-debuginfo script-without-shebang
/usr/src/debug/itpp-3.10.5/itpp/base/itpp_version.h
    - This is because the permission of this file is incorrect.

W: itpp-devel no-documentation
    - I think this can be ignored.

W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZTVN10__cxxabiv117__class_type_infoE
W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZTISt13basic_fstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEE
W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZNSt13basic_fstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEED1Ev
W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZNSt13basic_fstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEED0Ev
W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZThn8_NSt13basic_fstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEED1Ev
W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZThn8_NSt13basic_fstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEED0Ev
W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZTv0_n12_NSt13basic_fstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEED1Ev
W: itpp undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
_ZTv0_n12_NSt13basic_fstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcEED0Ev
       ..... (continued)
     - Linkage is incorrect. You can check this by:
       $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libitpp.so.2.2.0
       Some people say that this is not a blocker, while
       other perple say this is a blocker. My opinion is, since this is a library
       and is thought to be used by other package, this warning IS a blocker for
       this package.

* Requires:
  - Check the Requires for -devel packages (see the section Requires of
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines: For -devel package,
    dependency for the package should be checked manually).

* BuildRequies:
  - redundant BuildRequires is found.
    * perl (included in mimimal buildroot)
    * tetex, tetex-dvips <- required by tetex-latex

* Timestamps
  - cp AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README TODO \
      $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
    * Use "cp -p"

2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)...
  - Include "COPYTING" in main package. This is a MUST item.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]