[Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761

Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #20 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-15 15:00:08 EST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Once we have a better pool of packages in
> Vala, we would be able to determine the right path forward.    

This seems to be a chicken or egg problem.

When you don't build from vala, the pool of packages in vala won't grow.

'When in doubt, build from the source that upstream is going to be modifying,
fixing bugs in directly, etc.'
(quoted from
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-December/msg01006.html )
should be the right thing.

Or do you have any other update from the packaging committee, I missed atm?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]