Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-15 08:52:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. > > perl-IO-stringy.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > > /usr/share/doc/perl-IO-stringy-2.110/examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis > > perl-IO-stringy.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/perl-IO-stringy-2.110/examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis /usr/bin/perl > > ... > > > 3) Fix rpmlint message by adding following to %prep > > chmod 644 examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis > > The rpmlint warnings don't really need fixing; having the example executable > makes it easier to try, and the /usr/bin/perl dependency isn't adding anything > that isn't already required by the package. Just thought lets keep rpmlint silent. And yes I agree keeping it executable is easier to try. Thanks for committing the changes. But Just wonder do you see macros in SPEC are more recommended for perl packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review