Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555092 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource@xxxxxxxxx Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #2 from Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-14 08:58:01 EST --- Please read the packaging guidelines and use them to create your spec: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines At first sight I already noticed that the License tag is not valid for Fedora and the Source-tag does not use a URL. Please also provide links to a SRPM and it is also better to provide a direct link to the SPEC. Please also make yourself familiar with the review process: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process You should review other packages to show, that you understood the Fedora packaging guidelines. Then someone will sponsor you. If you have any more questions, please ask. Once you have adapted the SPEC-file more to the Fedora packaging guidelines, please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review