Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529496 --- Comment #43 from Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-13 11:08:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #42) > 1) Show that the C++ file is built with Fedora's global optflags. Do you have trouble clicking links? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1918807&name=build.log Or do you want me to grep the CFLAGS for you? make V=y 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' -j4 > 2) Show that the file LICENSE is included in the packages built from the > src.rpm. You mean the binary package? If so, will add. > 3) Show that no file in libmtag-devel.x86_64 (and libmtag-devel.ppc64) contains > a hardcoded /usr/lib. % rpm -q -l -p libmtag-0.3.4-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/libmtag.so.0 % rpm -q -l -p libmtag-devel-0.3.4-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm /usr/include/libmtag /usr/include/libmtag/mtag.h /usr/lib64/libmtag.so /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libmtag.pc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review