Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 Garrett Holmstrom <gholms.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gholms.fedora@xxxxxxxxx Bug 518318 depends on bug 518315, which changed state. Bug 518315 Summary: Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #7 from Garrett Holmstrom <gholms.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-12 23:04:55 EST --- Here are some more comments that should be useful: - libvanessa_socket/vanessa_socket_daemon.c is GPLv2+, not LGPLv2+, so I'm fairly certain the license field needs to change. - You actually do need to run autotools because the stock configure script adds an RPATH: vanessa_socket.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/vanessa_gethostbyname ['/usr/lib64'] vanessa_socket-pipe.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/vanessa_socket_pipe ['/usr/lib64'] - The only other complaint rpmlint has relates to a lack of %doc files in the devel subpackage; I'm not sure how important that is here. vanessa_socket-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review