Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552831 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-12 17:40:03 EST --- MUST items: [NO] rpmplint is silent: $ rpmlint ./perl-Date-Manip.spec. ./perl-Date-Manip.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 13) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [YES] Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. Please see note (1). [YES] Spec file matches base package name. [YES] License file is present, matching with spec file, Licensing Guidelines are met. Please see note (2). [YES] Spec file is legible and in American English. [YES] Source match upstream. [YES] Package builds OK. [YES] BuildRequires is correct. [YES] Package owns all the directories it creates. [YES] Package has no duplicity in %files. [YES] Permission on files are set properly. [YES] %clean section is correct. [YES] Spec file has consistent macro usage. [YES] Package is code or permissible content. [YES] %doc files don't affect runtime. [YES] Package doesn't own files that other packages own. [YES] Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at beginning of %install. [YES] All filenames are valid UTF-8. Should items: [YES] Should builds in mock. [YES] Should have sane scriptlets. Notes: (1) Extra space in %description after the end of the first sentence. (2) Can be LICENSE file included to %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review