Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 --- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-11 10:40:19 EST --- Re: comment 16 > if that's not a fit with the fedora mentality, [...] Wow! As another potential sponsor, who has run into this ticket, let me add the following: For a lower barrier to entry, I approve some packagers' accounts without requiring them to do reviews of stuff they may not have any interest in. You can review a hundred [perhaps trivial] packages and do packaging mistakes in your own packages nevertheless. Sometimes, someone wants to maintain a single package only, but shows off sufficient motivation in becoming a Fedora package contributor. If during the review process such a person is easy to deal with, responsive and open to hints and corrections, that's a chance to get sponsored because of criteria which are unrelated to having done prior reviews. If later on, the person changes attitudes and causes trouble, sponsorship may be revoked. If, on the contrary, a review -- like this one -- is not trouble-free already, the chance to get sponsored is reduced. You may find somebody inside Red Hat to sponsor you nevertheless based on other criteria, but during this review your comments/answers have been counterproductive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review