Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-06 18:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I don't think basically compiling the package in %post is a good idea. I thought of the idea too, and the building is fast, but I think it is really a little overkill just to get rid of an aesthetic issue. BTW, I could also copy the dump file in the build directory, which is exactly the same as the one in the build root, except that it contains the build dir path instead of the build root path. > Seriously, this is one of those things that check-buildroot is just going to > fail on. It remains to decide whether this is acceptable; I believe it is in > this case, but it needs more scrutiny. I straced the running of lush on one of the demos (which triggers some compiling through gcc), and there was not once a reference to the build root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review