Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102 Rakesh Pandit <rpandit@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |rpandit@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-10 12:03:29 EST --- [x] Build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1912264 Fine [x] rpmlint /tmp/gach7bjBZv/ghc-mtl.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install /tmp/gach7bjBZv/ghc-mtl.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag Ignore ghc-mtl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Ignore ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2/libHSmtl-1.1.0.2-ghc6.12.1.so ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2/libHSmtl-1.1.0.2-ghc6.12.1.so Ignore ghc-mtl.src: W: macro-in-%description %ghc_lib_package ghc-mtl.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ghc-mtl.src: W: no-buildroot-tag Ignore ghc-mtl-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-mtl-devel ghc-mtl-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-mtl-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2/libHSmtl-1.1.0.2_p.a Ignore [x] name fine [x] URL fine [x] source ok 883deca3cdf8052173c995b741bdedccc3c91440 (sha1sum) [x] spec name fine [x] license ok (copy present) and source has marking [x] source tree ok (no binaries present) [x] archs - fine [x] spec file legible and in american english [x] BR's ok [x] %files ok [x] folders owned - ok /usr/share/doc/ghc-mtl-1.1.0.2 /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2 [x] source builds fine on fedora ghc archs [x] no bundled dependencies [x] %clean section ok [x] filenames - ok (valid) [x] profiling ok [x] lib goes to %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version} [x] new macros APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review