[Bug 225942] Merge Review: jdepend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225942


Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx,
                   |                            |orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2010-01-08 17:43:40 EDT ---
    *  rpmlint

jdepend.spec:38: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
- I don't think this matters

jdepend.spec:53: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation
- Think we'er using "Documentation" now.

jdepend.spec:63: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java
jdepend.spec:70: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- not needed

jdepend.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
- but needed here

jdepend.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line 31)

    * naming - check
    * NamingGuidelines
    * licensing BSD
    * osi approved? yes
    * included? yes
    * correct mentioned in specfile? yes 

specfile

    * American English - yes
    * legible - yes
    * ExcludeArch, blocking - na
    * BuildRequires - yes
    * Locales - na
    * shared libraries: ldconfig - na
    *  %clean section with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} - yes
    * macros - 
    * sources - check
    * relocatable? Prefix: /usr? - na
    * files and directories

- Guidelines use unversioned directory for javadoc now

    * owns all created directories - yes
    * all files listed in %files 
    * permissions?
    * deffattr? - yes
    * no .la files - yes
    * .desktop for GUI applications - na
    * no conflicts with other packets - yes
    * permissable content - yes
    * doc - yes
    * large doc in -doc package - na
    * must not affect runtime - yes
    * sane scriptlets 

- No longer need:

# for /bin/rm and /bin/ln
Requires(post): coreutils
Requires(postun): coreutils

    * subpackages with fully versioned dependency - 

- Guidelines specify that the javadoc package require the main package

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]