Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2010-01-08 03:38:20 EDT --- Hi Gerd, (In reply to comment #7) > The name of the patch is changed, but not the name of the source-file. > > I suggest to extend the two lines in the spec-file from > > # $ make ed2bf5.tar > Source0: ed2bf5.tar > > to > > # $ make ed2bf5.tar > # $ mv ed2bf5.tar gitolite-%{version}.tar > # $ gzip -9 gitolite-%{version}.tar > Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Umm, that was an upstream decision (the file name), we don't usually rename upstream tarballs and I'm reluctant to do so. (In reply to comment #8) > I tried gitolite from the git. The command to clone the "testing" repository > works > with: > > $ git clone gitolite:testing.git > > but using the username and hostname > > $ git clone <user>@<host.domain>:testing.git again2 > > gives out the following error: > > Initialized empty Git repository in /home/gz016/gitolite/testing/again2/.git/ > fatal: 'testing.git': unable to chdir or not a git archive > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly > [gz016@hilton testing]$ The <user> above is always "gitolite". Gitolite doesn't use UNIX users/permissions to implement access control, it implements its own and determines the user name from the key used. Therefore, after initial checkout of gitolite-admin, add your key there, push back and you should be able to access the repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review