Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #56 from Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-07 21:12:33 EDT --- Replying to comment #55: Thanks! I've added a %check to the specfile. I used LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd) rather than LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. as I ran into problems that appeared to occur when a subprocess had changed working directory and could no longer find libpython. See the diff below for more info. Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3.spec Updated SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-3.1.1-11.fc12.src.rpm Diff: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-from-3.1.1-10-to-3.1.1.11.diff rpmlint output as before (see comment #27, comment #28, and comment #38) Koji scratch build into dist-f13 here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908523 Following up on comment #46: Issues addressed in release 10: > - fixup the factual errors in the comment describing redefinition of >__os_install_post > - cosmetic issue: exec vs find | xargs noted in comment #36 Remaining issues: > - a reviewer needs to go through the full review guidelines on this TODO > - perhaps fixup rpm-build to avoid needing > find-provides-without-python-sonames.sh > - fixup macros.python3 to bake in the definitions, avoid invoking python3 > each time > - verify the script in comment #17 still works and that it verifies the 2 and > 3 packages are independent > - what files are affected when modifying shebangs, and how (see commment #39) > - anything else I've missed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review