Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-06 00:48 EST ------- Well, to disable it, you put export QA_SKIP_BUILD_ROOT=1 at the end of %install. This does get things building, and I think it's acceptable to do this if there's certainty that the location of the buildroot isn't placed anywhere where it might affect the execution of any code. Now, for rpmlint: W: lush mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) Loads of these: W: lush devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/lush/packages/svm/lasvm/lasvm.c It's a compiler, so devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings are OK. What remains is a load of non-executable-script errors. These four: E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/compile-all 0644 E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/lush-find-string 0644 E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/make-html-manual 0644 E: lush non-executable-script /usr/share/lush/etc/make-latex-manual 0644 are the only ones that aren't demos or examples. Should they even be packaged? They look like build-time utilities. Should the demos and examples be packaged as documentation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review