Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-06 15:10:40 EDT --- Well, either one would be fine, IMO. With audacious-plugin-fc and audacious-plugin-xmp, some packagers complained about not putting them into the "audacious-plugins-" namespace. :) Hence I appended the "s" to match all other gstreamer-plugins- packages. There's nothing in the guidelines about this. There has been only one good rationale for appending the "s" even if it's just a single plugin: Users who are accustomed to queries like "yum list gstreamer-plugins\*" would not see the packages without "s". Btw, some of the audacious-plugins-foo packages contain only a single plugin, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review