Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-06 14:47:25 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architecture/PowerPC#PPC_Shell_access_for_debugging and as far as I know, Kevin Fenzi (kevin) offers access to 32-bit powerpc machines. [...] > fix_lib_path.patch You could have simply dropped the absolute library path altogether export LD_PRELOAD=libtsocks.so because it is stored in default search path for libraries. That would be arch-independent. [...] "man 8 tsocks" refers to /lib/libtsocks.so which doesn't match the current packaging. [...] Some additional run-time testing. From the bottom of "man 1 tsocks", | <without any argument> | create a new shell with LD_PRELOAD including tsocks(8). and the header of /usr/bin/tsocks: | The third form creates a new shell with LD_PRELOAD set and is achieved | simply by running the script with no arguments | | /usr/bin/tsocks | | When finished the user can simply terminate the shell with 'exit' Doesn't work: $ tsocks /usr/bin/tsocks: insufficient arguments $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review