[Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566





--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>  2010-01-06 14:47:25 EDT ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architecture/PowerPC#PPC_Shell_access_for_debugging

and as far as I know, Kevin Fenzi (kevin) offers access to 32-bit powerpc
machines.

[...]

> fix_lib_path.patch

You could have simply dropped the absolute library path altogether

  export LD_PRELOAD=libtsocks.so

because it is stored in default search path for libraries. That would be
arch-independent.

[...]

"man 8 tsocks" refers to /lib/libtsocks.so which doesn't match the current
packaging.

[...]

Some additional run-time testing. From the bottom of "man 1 tsocks",

|       <without any argument>
|              create a new shell with LD_PRELOAD including tsocks(8).

and the header of /usr/bin/tsocks:

| The third form creates a new shell with LD_PRELOAD set and is achieved
| simply by running the script with no arguments 
| 
| /usr/bin/tsocks
|
| When finished the user can simply terminate the shell with 'exit'

Doesn't work:

$ tsocks
/usr/bin/tsocks: insufficient arguments
$

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]