Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258 Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-05 10:31:16 EDT --- OK rpmlint on every package. OK name of package accords to the Naming Guidelines. OK spec file name match the base package %{name}. OK package meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK package has a good license. OK spec file is written in American English. OK spec file for the package must be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK successful koji compilation. OK correct BuildRequires, Requires. OK proper use of %find_lang macro. OK shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK relocatable package must state this fact. OK package must own their directories. OK permissions on files must be set properly. OK %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK consistent use of macros. OK package contains code, or permissable content. OK large documentation go in a -doc subpackage. OK %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. OK header files must be in a -devel package. OK static libraries must be in a -static package. OK pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK library files with a suffix (.so) must go in -devel. OK usually devel packages must require the base package. OK Remove .la libtool archives. OK GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK %install section starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review