Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532286 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-04 16:59:35 EDT --- > have seen that there's a -libs subpackage? Yes. The package contents are .noarch nevertheless. And it's broken currently: $ sudo rpm -i treeline-1.2.4-1.fc12.i686.rpm $ treeline /usr/bin/python: can't open file '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/treeline/treeline.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory What's the rationale for this strange -libs split-off? > Requires: PyQt4, python, qt, aspell https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires plus: "qt" is redundant, and treeline doesn't need it directly anyway plus: "python" is redundant, because the Python ABI dependency is automatic for the treeline module > BuildRequires: python, python-devel, desktop-file-utils, dos2unix > PyQt4, qt, aspell Same redundancy here. python-devel requires python, PyQt4 requires qt The fix for --short-circuit builds: --- treeline.spec.orig 2010-01-04 22:58:05.000000000 +0100 +++ treeline.spec 2010-01-04 22:58:26.000000000 +0100 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} python install.py -b %{buildroot} -mkdir __doc +rm -rf __doc ; mkdir __doc mv %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/* __doc rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review