Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Alexander Kahl <akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #30 from Alexander Kahl <akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-04 10:04:58 EDT --- Hi, I've been following this review for some time now as I'm not aware of any existing self-executable CL-based packages in Fedora besides CL implementations themselves so this could well be the very first one; I would like to see things learned from the review in the wiki as I'm going to package CL stuff myself sometime in the future and I find the existing Lisp-related guidelines sparse; e.g. I'd conclude from what is written down right now that providing self-executable Lisp machines that are not the original implementations themselves is impossible, instead it looks like Lisp is treated like scripting languages in Fedora (which is - of course - utterly wrong) since the guidelines force use of cl- prefixes for both libs (OK) and programs (bad) and source code distribution only. I could be wrong here since the guidelines mentions "Libraries and Programs" in the headline but doesn't refer to the latter in the following body. Source: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Lisp#Guidelines_for_Libraries_and_Programs_written_in_Common_Lisp Would you mind starting a discussion about this in fedora-devel? I'd really like to see this resolved in an official manner and make Lisp-based projects first-level citizens in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review