Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter <fabian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-04 08:48:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does it make sense to package the client without the server? Sure because the server is available for other distrbutions. > Or is it also on the way? The server will come but I don't want to specify a point in time. > A few other comments: > > - License is GPLv2+ and not GPLv2 only I missed that. Thanks will be fixed in the next update. > - Could you explain your strange release number? The numbering system that is used by upstream is indeed a bit strange. For me this looks like a Debian thing. I will get in touch with upstream. Maybe they drop some numbers of their release... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review