Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Marek Mahut <mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut <mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-03 13:34:55 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Do we need to have it as specific server sub-package? - Spec file looks sane. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - License field in spec matches the content of tarball - License file included in package matches used code. - BuildRequires are correct - Builds in mock for rawhide, installation too. - Rpmlint is clean. This package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review